百家乐怎么玩-澳门百家乐官网娱乐城网址_网上百家乐是不是真的_全讯网888 (中国)·官方网站

Professor Lin Yu-sheng delivers lecture on academic freedom at CityU

Longgen Chen

 

Professor Lin Yu-sheng, member of Academia Sinica, Taiwan, delivered a talk at the Distinguished Scholar Lecture on 19 December at City University of Hong Kong (CityU), entitled Theoretical Foundation of Academic Freedom and its Practical Implications, commenting that “it is easier to generate academic achievements and promote mutual exchange, coordination and collaboration if individual scholars are allowed to conduct research according to their own interests, ideas, intuition and impulses.” The lecture is one of the celebratory activities for CityU’s 25th anniversary.

Professor Lin first reflected upon the ideas expressed by the Chinese academic world about freedom of thought and academic freedom ever since the May 4th Movement in 1919. Then he defined the two concepts of “freedom”: negative freedom and positive freedom. He specified that negative freedom meant the absence of obstacles, barriers or constraints. In such freedom, an individual acts as he or she wishes. However, this kind of freedom may cause the general populace to degenerate into isolated “atomists” thinking only of themselves and showing no concerns for others. Positive freedom, on the other hand, meant the possibility of acting in such a way as to take control of one’s life and realise one’s fundamental purposes.

Professor Lin pointed out that academic freedom is a combination of both concepts of freedom without their defects. According to Michael Polanyi, he said “academic freedom consists in the right to choose one’s own problem for investigation, to conduct research free from any outside control, and to teach one’s subject in the light of one’s own opinions.” He noted that academic freedom must be subject to the bottom line ― academic norms and disciplines. If an individual scholar violates the academic norms, he or she is not allowed to have academic freedom. “Academic freedom generates academic order; academic order generates academic achievements; and academic achievements confirm academic freedom. This develops into a positive circle,” said Professor Lin.

On the practical implications of academic freedom, Professor Lin expounded: “Strict measures should be adopted in the selection of scholars to be engaged in academic research. Once selected, the scholars should enjoy academic freedom to the fullest extent. Academic administrative organs should leave the scholars alone. The more academic freedom first-class scholars enjoy, the more time and effort they will be able to devote to academic pursuit, hence the more outstanding academic achievements.”

Professor Lin pointed out that scholars on the mainland and in Taiwan enjoy comparatively less academic freedom, therefore it limits their academic achievements. Taking the overseas Chinese Nobel laureates for example, Professor Lin explained, “The number of overseas Chinese winning the Nobel laureates is high compared to its overseas population, partly due to the Chinese families’ cultural tradition of attaching importance to learning. But the kind of academic freedom they enjoy is another important factor.”

Professor Lin pointed out that a fair and impartial system is crucial in selecting appropriate scholars for teaching and /or research positions. “Not everyone is suited for doing research. Only those scholars who feel an irresistible impulse or urge and have remarkable insight are suited for academic pursuit,” said Professor Lin. “At the same time they should be provided with some leisure.”

He said that, guided by fair and impartial academic norms and discipline, scholars engaged in academic research can best devote themselves to research of their own interest and make outstanding academic achievements. “A dynamic academic tradition is the best way to prevent academic freedom from being abused or misused,” added Professor Lin.

Professor Lin Yu-sheng is an Emeritus Professor of the History Department in the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Chair Professor of the

History Department in the National Taiwan University. Studying under Taiwan’s great thinker Yin Hai-kuang and Friedrich Hayek, a leading authority on Western liberalism, he conducted a systematic study of the theory of liberalism and published a number of monographs on related topics. Professor Lin Yu-sheng is an acclaimed master of the history of Chinese thought. The Distinguished Scholar Lecture was sponsored by CityU’s Cultural & Sports Committee. Professor Leo Lee Ou-fan, member of Academia Sinica, Taiwan, was invited to preside over the lecture.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED

Contact Information

Communications and Institutional Research Office

Back to top
大发888真钱娱乐场| 百家乐游戏教程| 赌博中百家乐什么意思| 澳门百家乐是骗人的| 广州百家乐赌博机| 皇冠网现金网| 百家乐如何稳赢| 赌博百家乐经验| 百家乐官网代打公司| 网上百家乐官网分析软件| 哪个百家乐网站信誉好| 百家乐官网赌场导航| 蓝盾百家乐官网洗码| 大发888娱乐城官方下载安装| 大发888zhldu| 玩百家乐官网去哪个平台好| 迪威百家乐官网赌场娱乐网规则| 大发888被查封| 网上百家乐官网群的微博| 网上百家乐赌博出| 金宝博备用网址| 百家乐官网网站赌钱吗| 云博投注| 博彩百家乐带连线走势图| 澳门百家乐官网投注法| 百家乐赌博程序| 百家乐官网庄闲几率| 威尼斯人娱乐城赌百家乐| 百家乐官网经验之谈| 百家乐规则以及玩法| 淘金百家乐现金网| 大发888免费游戏| 百家乐赌场详解| 新澳门百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 塑料百家乐筹码| 玛沁县| 百家乐官网规律和方法| 金秀| 新全讯网网址g5vvv| 澳门百家乐玩大小| 代理百家乐官网试玩|